Blog/28 Apr 2026
Markup vs margin: the math estimators get wrong on every other quote
A 25% markup is not a 25% margin. The two-minute explainer with the formulas, a working example, and why it matters for fit-out work specifically.
pricingmarginmath
A surprising number of fit-out estimators use markup and margin as if they were the same word. They are not, and confusing them is one of the cheapest ways to lose money on a quote.
Two minutes, a worked example, then back to work.
The two formulas
Markup is on top of cost:
sell = cost × (1 + markup)
If your cost is $80 and your markup is 25%, your sell rate is $100.
Margin is a share of sell:
margin = (sell − cost) / sell
Same numbers — cost $80, sell $100 — your margin is (100 − 80) / 100 = 20%.
So: a 25% markup gives you a 20% margin. Not 25%.
Why this matters
Suppliers quote you in cost. Clients see sell. The number you actually keep is margin. If you mentally treat your 25% markup as your 25% margin, you have already given yourself a 5-percentage-point haircut on every line — and on a $40,000 fit-out quote that is $2,000 you thought you had banked but did not.
Multiply across a year of quotes and the gap is meaningful.
A working example
Suppose you are quoting 100 m of 100mm 40kg drywall partition.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Cost | $80 / m |
| Markup | 1.25× (25%) |
| Sell | $100 / m |
| Total cost | $8,000 |
| Total sell | $10,000 |
| Profit | $2,000 |
| Margin | 20% |
Now suppose you wanted a real 25% margin instead of a 25% markup. You would need:
sell = cost / (1 - margin)
sell = 80 / (1 - 0.25)
sell = 80 / 0.75
sell = $106.67
Markup of 1.33× gives a 25% margin. The markup that matches a target margin is always a bigger number than the margin.
A cheat sheet
| Target margin | Required markup |
|---|---|
| 10% | 1.11× |
| 15% | 1.18× |
| 20% | 1.25× |
| 25% | 1.33× |
| 30% | 1.43× |
| 40% | 1.67× |
| 50% | 2.00× |
Print it. Tape it to your monitor.
Why we expose both in Quotiqa
The pricing card takes a markup and a cost, computes the sell, and shows the margin live. The estimator can think in either direction:
- "I want a 1.25× markup" → margin chip shows 20%, decide if that is enough
- "I want a 22% margin" → adjust markup to ~1.28× until the chip says 22%
The chip is the answer. The chip is what your business cares about. The markup is just the lever you happen to be pulling.
What to do today
Open last quarter's quotes. Compute margin properly: (sell − cost) / sell, line by line. Compare to what you thought you were charging. If you have been thinking in markup but answering in margin (or vice versa), the gap is the size of your annual error.
Then come back to a tool that surfaces both. We are biased about which one — but the margin sandbox in the simulator is interactive if you want to play with the math before deciding.
Related posts
29 Apr 2026
Why we replaced the single rate with cost × markup × sell
Most takeoff tools store one sell rate per item. We split it into cost, markup, and sell — and the margin chip is the reason.
22 Apr 2026
How to calibrate a PDF for takeoff (and why you must do it on every page)
Calibration is the moment your takeoff becomes trustworthy. The five-minute walkthrough plus the four mistakes that cost estimators an entire quote.
30 Apr 2026
From PDF plan to client quote in under five minutes
The exact path we follow inside Quotiqa: upload, calibrate, measure, price, export — and what to skip if you want the quote out fast.